Frantic Assembly’s “Metamorphosis” has been the subject of numerous online reviews, and after thorough research, I present to you my findings. The play, directed by John Tiffany and adapted by Steven Hoggett, has received a mix of opinions and criticisms from reviewers across the board.

The play, based on Franz Kafka’s novella, follows the story of Gregor Samsa, a young man who wakes up one day to find himself transformed into a giant insect. The production is known for its innovative use of physical theatre and movement, with Frantic Assembly’s signature style of dynamic and visceral performances.

One of the most notable aspects of the play that consistently drew praise from multiple online reviews was the innovative use of physical movement. Many reviewers commended the dynamic and bold choices of the actors and choreographers in bringing Kafka’s surreal and nightmarish world to life. The use of physicality and movement to convey emotions and tell the story was lauded as a refreshing and powerful approach to theatre.

Aside from the physical aspect, the play’s technical aspects also received their fair share of attention. The lighting design, set design, and soundscapes were all praised for their seamless integration with the physical performances. The production succeeded in creating an immersive and atmospheric experience that transported the audience into Gregor Samsa’s nightmarish world.

On the other hand, some reviewers were critical of the play’s avant-garde approach and described it as alienating and inaccessible. They questioned whether the physicality and movement were being used as a substitute for a lack of clear narrative and character development. Several reviews highlighted the potential for a disconnect between the audience and the characters due to the abstract and non-traditional storytelling approach.

It is essential to note that the casting and performances also received a varied response. While some praised the ensemble’s commitment and conviction, others felt that the characters lacked emotional depth and nuance. The portrayal of Gregor Samsa’s transformation and its impact on his relationships with his family members was a central point of contention among reviewers.

Furthermore, the adaptation from the source material also polarized opinions. While some appreciated the bold reimagining and contemporary relevance of Kafka’s work, others felt that the play veered too far from the original text, diluting the essence of Kafka’s themes and message.

Overall, the online reviews of Frantic Assembly’s “Metamorphosis” seem to reflect a diverse range of opinions that are as complex and layered as the play itself. It is evident that the production’s bold experimentation with physical theatre has both captivated and divided audiences and critics alike.

In conclusion, the unique and inventive approach to storytelling, coupled with the technical prowess displayed in “Metamorphosis,” is undoubtedly worth experiencing. However, the play’s avant-garde nature and abstract narrative may not resonate with everyone. Frantic Assembly’s latest production is a thought-provoking and visually stunning work of art that challenges conventional norms and pushes the boundaries of theatre. Whether it leaves a lasting impression or falls short of expectations will ultimately depend on individual tastes and preferences.